Michael Collins plays Mozart:Themes and variations

4 December 2018: Stratford Play House
5 December 2018: Royal Birmingham Conservatoire

• Igor Stravinsky – Concerto in D for string orchestra ‘Basle’
• Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart – Clarinet Concerto in A major, K.622
• Igor Stravinsky – Concerto in E flat for chamber orchestra ‘Dumbarton Oaks’
• Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart – Symphony No.40 in G minor ‘Great G minor Symphony’, K.550

Today’s concert is a rich demonstration of just how broad the classification – and content – of ‘classical’ music can be. Stravinsky’s paired concertos are Neoclassical (1920-1950, or thereabouts); and their inspiration and form stem mainly from the Baroque period (approximately 1600-1750). Mozart (1756-1791), of course, is held up by many as the very model of a Classical (1750-1820 or so) composer; but – especially at the outset of his life and career – was, of course, also indebted to the works of Bach, Handel, Lully, etc..

However, it did not take long for young Wolfgang to stretch the categorization of his output and dig the foundations of what would become to be known as the Romantic (roughly 1780-1910) – despite Britten claiming that “A certain rot… set in with Beethoven”. Nor, listening to Bach’s Goldberg Variations, is it difficult to find such defining personal passion and self-centred sentiment within, or to be intensely moved by them. All of which only goes to show why the above numbers (apart from Mozart’s) are so very “thereabouts”, “approximately”, “or so”, and “roughly”; and may explain why Descartes once opined that “Perfect numbers like perfect men are very rare…” – although Hamlet’s written claim to Ophelia that “I am ill at these numbers” may be much more accurate!

The case I am trying to make is that Mozart – despite, to that “many”, being just the creator of memorable melodies (such as lies at the centre of today’s heartbreaking Clarinet Concerto) – not only crossed musical divides; but, in many cases, actually invented them. And the ‘Great G minor Symphony’, which closes the concert, is the perfect demonstration of that: evoking Classicism and Romanticism, and predicting Serialism, all in the space of around twenty-five minutes. In other words, his music is all his own; it defies (or at least pushes back at the boundaries of) classification… – although there is no doubt in my mind that his œuvre can be labelled that of a genuine genius.

PS: Even defining the overarching term ‘classical music’ can be laborious; but I am happy to accept Wikipedia’s – that it is “Art music produced or rooted in the traditions of Western culture, including both liturgical (religious) and secular music”. If you think you know, and/or can do better, please email your suggestion to writer@orchestraoftheswan.org with the subject ‘Definition’. The best entry will win two complimentary tickets for a concert of your choice, and will be published in the next programme.

Bach to the Future:Themes and variations

8 November 2016: Stratford ArtsHouse
9 November 2016: Town Hall, Birmingham

• Johann Sebastian Bach, arranged Steve Martland – Toccata and Fugue in D minor, BWV 565
• Johann Sebastian Bach – Brandenburg Concerto no2 in F major, BWV 1047
• Douglas J Cuomo – Objects In Mirror [world premiere]
• Johann Sebastian Bach – Brandenburg Concerto no3 in G major, BWV 1048
• Igor Stravinsky – Concerto in E-flat for chamber orchestra ‘Dumbarton Oaks’

If Ben Jonson was correct – and the last 400 years should be proof enough – then Shakespeare “was not of an age, but for all time!” And, I believe, musically, the same can (and should) be said of Bach. It seems almost inconceivable, now – considering his enduring popularity and influence – that his compositions were not widely appreciated until Mendelssohn revived the St Matthew Passion in 1829 (100 years after its first performance). Although his ascendance since, of course, has been stratospheric – literally, in the case of the three pieces sent into space with the Voyager probes: one of which is the opening movement of this concert’s second Brandenburg Concerto.

Musicians from all genres therefore continue to utilize Bach’s creations as the basis of – and inspiration for – their own: amongst my personal favourites, Jacques Loussier’s jazzy interpretation of the Goldberg Variations, and Shostakovich’s sublime 24 Preludes and Fugues. And, of course, this concert is itself a perfect demonstration of the great composer’s musical longevity, as well as his abiding relevance.

The opening, thrilling arrangement sets the tone perfectly: a famous keyboard work transformed into fresh fireworks for string orchestra; followed by four sumptuous examples of the concerto grosso – which all demonstrate, in contrasting ways, what pinnacles can be achieved with a few strings, an occasional harpsichord, and dazzlingly different arrays of solo instruments.

Although we may initially think of Corelli, Handel or Vivaldi as the main proponents of this antiphonal form – in which a small group of soloists (the concertino) are ‘accompanied’ by (or alternate with) a larger orchestra (the ripieno): one built upon a continuo of harpsichord and bass instruments – Bach, for me, is its ultimate master: richly expanding its original strings-only remit. His six Brandenburg Concertos are multivariate perfection: demonstrating just how sublime and diverse such concertante works can be – both in style and in orchestral colouring.

It is no wonder, therefore, that this classical form also continues to galvanize: often prompting composers to produce compact masterpieces of their own – a quick glance across the Pond revealing Barber’s stunning Capricorn Concerto, and the striking Stravinsky which ends today’s programme. In using the same forces as the second Brandenburg Concerto – and to such scintillating effect: revelling in the still-coruscating alloys of instrumental juxtaposition, 300 years on – Douglas J Cuomo can certainly also claim his position as their worthy successor.